Search found 447 matches
- Sun Jun 29, 2008 8:18 pm
- Forum: Common Lisp
- Topic: SBCL 1.0.18 released
- Replies: 4
- Views: 14524
SBCL 1.0.18 released
Juho Snellman just announced that SBCL 1.0.18 has been released. From the announcement: Source is available in SourceForge CVS and on the SourceForge File Releases page. changes in sbcl-1.0.18 relative to 1.0.17: * minor incompatible change: SB-SPROF:WITH-PROFILING now by default profiles only the c...
- Sun Jun 29, 2008 8:03 pm
- Forum: The Lounge
- Topic: Cars
- Replies: 4
- Views: 12369
Cars
Okay, something non-Lisp for you all... Just took my car in last week for service. The driver's-side door lock would lock but not unlock. Very annoying, as it forced me to keep climbing into the driver's seat through the passenger's-side door every time I left work to drive home. In short, I had to ...
- Sun Jun 29, 2008 5:46 pm
- Forum: Common Lisp
- Topic: SBCL on hardened Linux with PaX
- Replies: 9
- Views: 29142
Re: SBCL on hardened Linux with PaX
Hmmm... doesn't sound good. I might post that question to the sbcl-developers list and see what they have to say.
- Sun Jun 29, 2008 5:45 pm
- Forum: Other Dialects
- Topic: Clojure reactions?
- Replies: 16
- Views: 45933
Re: Clojure reactions?
For me, the main reason for using an existing runtime (e.g., the JVM or .NET) is to avoid reimplementing a runtime ;-) It's nice to know that your garbage collector is tuned and well-tested, for example. I agree with that as long as the rest of the system isn't dog-slow because you're having to box...
- Sun Jun 29, 2008 3:46 pm
- Forum: The Lounge
- Topic: Thank you.
- Replies: 22
- Views: 46385
Re: Thank you.
vegard, thanks for the input. I'll see what I can do on the syntax highlighting. Not sure if phpBB already has such a thing or not, but it's designed to be modular, so I'm sure something could be added if it doesn't exist already. As for each reply having a subject, not sure why the forum does that,...
- Sun Jun 29, 2008 11:11 am
- Forum: The Lounge
- Topic: LispForum topic structure
- Replies: 12
- Views: 29882
Re: LispForum topic structure
Wouldn't it be more helpful to have the topics arranged by level of expertise (beginner, intermidiate &c) or by area of usage (sripting, web application &c), than by implementation. Not sure if this forum supports it, but perhaps it would be useful with a multi-paradigm taxonomy (tags?). Ju...
- Sun Jun 29, 2008 11:01 am
- Forum: Common Lisp
- Topic: FastCGI for SBCL?
- Replies: 8
- Views: 18575
Re: FastCGI for SBCL?
I think you can use mod_lisp with lighttpd too. See also: http://objectmix.com/lisp/256388-mod_lisp-over-cgi.html http://xach.livejournal.com/144475.html Hmm... I might investigate whether mod_lisp works for lighttpd. It boggles my mind, however, that the rest of the world is moving to FastCGI for ...
- Sun Jun 29, 2008 10:53 am
- Forum: Common Lisp
- Topic: SBCL on hardened Linux with PaX
- Replies: 9
- Views: 29142
Re: SBCL on hardened Linux with PaX
Is there a way to turn PaX off selectively? I remember when Feodra/RHEL first added some of the memory randomization features standard, there were some issues with SBCL. Juho worked with Arjan at Red Hat to work out something that would allow SBCL to work. I don't remember exactly what did the trick...
- Sun Jun 29, 2008 10:51 am
- Forum: Common Lisp
- Topic: Lisp primitives?
- Replies: 9
- Views: 30053
Re: Lisp primitives?
Perhaps Lisp in Small Pieces will help? :) I haven't read it, and I think it's more about Scheme than lisp, but I thought it was worth a mention. Lisp in Small Pieces is a great resource if you're interested in implementing Lisp, and it will help even if you're interested in Lisps other than Scheme...
- Sun Jun 29, 2008 10:44 am
- Forum: Books and Resources
- Topic: What's your favorite book about Lisp?
- Replies: 34
- Views: 2072527
Re: What's your favorite book about Lisp?
On Lisp is missing from the list ;) Ack! You're right. I typically don't think of it because I don't have and can't get a printed copy of it (still waiting for Paul to get something over to Apress to republish it, I guess... :roll: ). Anyway, yep, that's a serious omission. The polling module only ...