Search found 14 matches
- Fri Jan 08, 2010 7:23 pm
- Forum: Common Lisp
- Topic: Lisp Debugger
- Replies: 5
- Views: 13357
Re: Lisp Debugger
Lispworks has a 'stepper' which lets you step though the execution of your code.
- Sun Dec 27, 2009 1:20 am
- Forum: Common Lisp
- Topic: Framebuffer with Common Lisp
- Replies: 1
- Views: 3703
Re: Framebuffer with Common Lisp
It seems directFB is supported as a backend by SDL, so it should be supported by lispbuilder-sdl. You will most likely have to write a couple of routines in C to compose the remote VNC images onto a SDL surface. Performing this kind of operation in Lisp is not efficient as each pixel write goes thro...
- Tue Sep 15, 2009 11:40 am
- Forum: Common Lisp
- Topic: EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION???
- Replies: 3
- Views: 5419
Re: EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION???
I have been bitten by that before.dmitry_vk wrote:Your defcstruct's are wrong. :string declares a structure field that is a pointer, but in your case it should inline array.
- Mon Aug 10, 2009 5:32 pm
- Forum: Common Lisp
- Topic: Sbcl Dll Loading Error-Converting to Text
- Replies: 4
- Views: 9809
Re: Sbcl Dll Loading Error-Converting to Text
A question, has anyone had experience with the following problem on windows? You try to load a dll, say libclutter, and you receive an error message that this dll depends on another. Then you try to load that new dll, and it has a new dependency. Thus, you have to go through all the dependencies an...
- Tue Apr 14, 2009 2:11 pm
- Forum: Common Lisp
- Topic: Rant: lisp is not C. Get over it.
- Replies: 47
- Views: 231217
Re: Rant: lisp is not C. Get over it.
Doesn't cater to beginners: In what way is it harder for beginners than Python or Ruby? It's easier for beginners than C or Java, in my opinion, because of its interactive nature: you can just start typing expressions. And these days there are many good textbooks, such as "Practical Common Lis...
- Tue Apr 07, 2009 12:02 pm
- Forum: Common Lisp
- Topic: newbie HELP!!
- Replies: 5
- Views: 7707
Re: newbie HELP!!
You need to read up on 'Expert Systems'.
- Thu Mar 19, 2009 1:34 pm
- Forum: Common Lisp
- Topic: Auto documentation for lisp?(output html, prefered)
- Replies: 15
- Views: 21686
Re: Auto documentation for lisp?(output html, prefered)
Take a look at http://common-lisp.net/project/tinaa/ I hit a problem, somewhat like this guy .. That was an entertaining link, thanks for posting :) I am bemused that Common Lisp is so good at some things, and yet so utterly crap at others. However that being said, most CL projects have a single de...
- Sun Feb 22, 2009 10:36 pm
- Forum: Books and Resources
- Topic: Any book/resources on Requirements Specs?
- Replies: 7
- Views: 44232
Re: Any book/resources on Requirements Specs?
With Trac or Redmine you can add something like "For #27" in the checkin message and it will automagically link the tracker entry to the sourcecode and vice versa. Then, tada, traceability. How does it handle changes to requirements over time, or over phases? For example a specific requir...
- Sun Feb 22, 2009 10:31 pm
- Forum: Books and Resources
- Topic: Any book/resources on Requirements Specs?
- Replies: 7
- Views: 44232
Re: Any book/resources on Requirements Specs?
At the moment we use it internally. Redmine (and I think most of what follows applies to Trac also) allows you to define custom fields for issue trackers. So for instance I have a Use Cases tracker with fields for the Primary Actor, Goal, Success Guarantees etc. Then I put the body of the use case ...
- Mon Feb 16, 2009 12:23 pm
- Forum: Common Lisp
- Topic: sbcl on windows XP
- Replies: 7
- Views: 13275
Re: sbcl on windows XP
Corman Lisp doesn't work correctly with ASDF, so not exactly newbie friendly.nuntius wrote: Corman Lisp is another excellent option; I think it has the tightest integration with MSWin.