LispForum

Thank you very much for your patience!

So what's wrong with the following code? (defconstant +Functions+ '(1+ 1-)) (defun compile-Function (Function) `((let ((val (funcall ,Function 4))) (if (>= val 0) val (return-From evaluate -100))))) (defun compile-Functions (Functions) `(defun evaluate () (+ ,@(loop for Function from Functions appen...

Only explicit calls to a function can be inlined. If you are holding functions in a variable, how can the compiler know which function that variable will be holding so that it can inline it? Well, because +functions+ is a constant? Is there no possibility to write a macro that translates this code ...

In the following code, 1+ and 1- aren't inlined in foo. How can I achieve this?

I want the functions to be called to be inlined.

Given ,

I want to define a macro that expands into How do I manage this?

What about this function? (Doesn't preserve first and last letter, though.) (defun random-shuffle (lis) (let ((len (length lis))) (loop for i from 0 to (1- len) do (let ((temp (elt Liste i)) (Position (random len))) (setf (elt lis i) (elt lis Position)) (setf (elt lis Position) temp)))))

I found a working Windows version: http://ecls.wikispaces.com/VCExpress

Is there another CL->C compiler besides ECL? (thinlisp and CLiCC appear to be dead projects.)

I wrote a bash script, which creates a backup of the .c/.h files after being written to them.

Now I have another question: Did anyone manage to compile ECL on Windows using MSVC++? I get the error "msvcrt.lib" not found (by nmake), although ...\VC\lib is in PATH.