Search found 4 matches
- Mon Dec 07, 2009 4:15 pm
- Forum: Common Lisp
- Topic: package confusion
- Replies: 4
- Views: 5212
Re: package confusion
Oh dear, well this is embarrasing. It's working now. I'm not sure why, I killed slime and restarted several times. But now everything seems to be working as it should. How is the best way to export & symbols? I'm using "&OPTIONAL" for now because that's how it showed up in (descirb...
- Mon Dec 07, 2009 3:49 pm
- Forum: Common Lisp
- Topic: package confusion
- Replies: 4
- Views: 5212
Re: package confusion
No, I'm not. I'm using SBCL on Mac (latest one in ports). I have my prelude.base defsystem that depends on nothing and a prelude.string system that depends on prelude.base. You tried join without the cl:&optional? And str:join was able to be called with one argument?
- Mon Dec 07, 2009 12:40 pm
- Forum: Common Lisp
- Topic: package confusion
- Replies: 4
- Views: 5212
package confusion
Hello all, I am experimenting with creating my own set of packages that my own software can use instead of the cl package. This, of course, depends on actually being able to use the common-lisp symbols, just controlling how they're exported. So I have my base package, called "PRELUDE.BASE"...
- Sat May 02, 2009 1:33 pm
- Forum: Common Lisp
- Topic: Interest in a Lisp CMS?
- Replies: 16
- Views: 21916
Re: Interest in a Lisp CMS?
I would also be very interested in a Lisp CMS. Are you going to use something like UCW, or completely custom?